Texas Court Subjects Override to Non-Consent Penalties
The Energy Law Blog
MAY 24, 2007
Based on both the division order and the JOA terms, the Count found that BTA was not obligated to make any present payments to Boldrick for his overriding royalty interest currently being used to pay the costs and expenses of the well. Therefore, Boldrick’s reliance on those provisions to support his claim was misplaced.
Let's personalize your content