Remove Casing Remove Pipeline Remove Transportation
article thumbnail

Fifth Circuit Rejects Disgorgement of Profits Claim for Pipeline Trespass

The Energy Law

Fifth Circuit held that a landowner is not entitled to a pipeline company’s profits as a consequence of a portion of a pipeline being located partially outside of a servitude. This case was handled by Paul Adkins of Liskow’s Baton Rouge office. Read the opinion here.

article thumbnail

Fifth Circuit Rejects Disgorgement of Profits Claim for Pipeline Trespass

The Energy Law

Fifth Circuit held that a landowner is not entitled to a pipeline company’s profits as a consequence of a portion of a pipeline being located partially outside of a servitude. This case was handled by Paul Adkins of Liskow’s Baton Rouge office. Read the opinion here.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court of Texas Revises Opinion in Pipeline Common-Carrier Case

The Energy Law

By Carlos Moreno : The Supreme Court of Texas recently delivered a revised opinion discussing the power of eminent domain exercised by a common carrier CO2 pipeline. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC , No. Denbury Green then attempted to condemn a pipeline easement from land owned by Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. Texas Rice”).

article thumbnail

TRANSPORTATION OIL AND GAS CONGRESS, 21th-22th of February, 2022

Energy Central

Business and Technical Views On The Market At The Transportation Oil and Gas Congress 2022 A strategic look at the pipelines industry for both managing and technical solutions is essential for market development.

article thumbnail

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS VACATES FOUR PIPELINE-SAFETY STANDARDS BASED ON INADEQUATE FINAL COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES

Vorys Energy

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated four pipeline-safety standards promulgated by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and denied the petition of a fifth challenged standard. Interstate Natural Gas Association of America v. 23-1173.

article thumbnail

Must FERC weigh GHG emissions in pipeline reviews?

Global Energy

In the 2004 case of U.S. Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen,[1] the Supreme Court established an important limiting principle under […]

article thumbnail

Western District Rejects Disgorgement of Profits Claim for Pipeline Trespass

The Energy Law

QEP Energy Company , the Western District of Louisiana rejected, for the second time in this case, Plaintiffs’ claims seeking a disgorgement of QEP’s profits. This case was handled by Paul Adkins of Liskow’s Baton Rouge office. Accordingly, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of QEP as to all of Plaintiffs’ claims.