This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
For energy consumers that have flexibility to modify their energy use in response to direction from a utility or the relevant transmission operator (i.e., to reduce load by changing or […] The post FERC’s Enforcement in Demand Response Case a Lesson for Utilities appeared first on POWER Magazine.
Although in some cases it is used simply for convenience, such as when operating certain pneumatic tools, in other cases, compressed […] The post Five Energy-Saving Tips for Compressed Air Systems appeared first on POWER Magazine. Compressed air is vitally important to all power plants.
08-23-00218-CV in the El Paso Court of Appeals, PPC Energy operated several marginal wells producing from the Delaware Mountain Group. It sued several disposal well operators in the vicinity for killing nine of PPC’s producing wells, resulting in a total loss of their remaining reserves. PPC Energy , No.
The SRPMIC Department of Transportation and ZEV have conducted a complete fleet assessment, reviewing fleet operations, vehicle use cases, routes, loads and HVAC requirements. (ZEV) has teamed up with the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC) in Arizona to address carbon emissions in the SRPMIC and throughout the valley.
Fasken operates wells on the property; the Puig descendants sued Fasken for deducting post-production costs from their royalty. Puig, Jr., as his own property free of cost forever. Said interest hereby reserved is Non-Participating Royalty.
Transforming operations digitally means implementing dozens of use cases. By linking them together with a robust reference architecture, the digital factory becomes more than the sum of its parts.
The casing pipe is mandatory in drilling operations as it has a lot of casing functions to prevent cave-in of unconsolidated formations, isolate problem zones, and many more. As mentioned before in our casing design guide, the selection of casing depends on many factors.
But with widely varying service costs across use cases and geography, providers must address operational and service issues to realize that promise. Robo-taxis promise affordable mobility.
Making big operational changes before spinning off assets can be daunting, but our research indicates that doing so can dramatically improve the odds of deal success.
Operators’ energy costs keep rising, but efficiency measures and organizational change can lower them by 15 to 20 percent in a year, benefiting company profits and the environment.
Operators see a marginally positive business case, expect rollout at scale to take until 2022, and don’t think the increase in capital-expense-to-sales ratio will be as big as skeptics claim.
The current proposed bill, however, would require operators to remit all royalty payments directly to the lessors on behalf of nonparticipating working interest owners prior to well payout, i.e., during the recoupment of costs, and the statutorily authorized risk charge.
Operators may now have the potential to sell carbon credits in exchange for the P&A of inactive, shut-in, or temporarily abandoned wells. Although Louisiana is allocating significant funds to P&A orphan wells, there is a lack of financial incentive for operators to address AOOG wells.
Another case interpreting a royalty reservation in an old conveyance has been decided by the 11th Court of Appeals in Eastland: Boren Descendants and Mabee Descendants v. Fasken is also the operator of wells on the 60,000 acres. Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. , two consolidated appeals, Nos. 11-22-00365-CV and 11-23-00001-CV.
million dollars in emergency costs from prior operators of an orphaned well. The Court held that, when the LDNR spends monies from the Oilfield Site Restoration Fund on emergencies, it can only recoup those costs from the well’s operator of record and its working interest owners. who last operated the property. 4/6/22), –So.
The demands facing general and administrative functions are changing, strengthening the case for corporate centers to embrace more flexible operating models.
Written by Marc Published January 29, 2025 Written by Marc Published January 29, 2025 AI and the Energy Grid: 10 Use Cases for Utilities AI and the energy grid are becoming closely connected as grids grow more complex and electrification increases. One is finding the best possible use case fit.
Advanced analytics has the potential to transform grocery operations, but many retailers struggle to harness these capabilities to improve performance. Two emerging use cases could point the way.
The first five Plaquemines Parish Coastal Zone Management Act (“CZMA”) cases to be set for trial have been chosen. Rozel Operating Company, et al. The Plaintiffs selected Parish of Plaquemines v. Parish of Plaquemines v. ConocoPhillips Company, et al. , and Parish of Plaquemines v. Hilcorp Energy Company, et al.
In a legacy case defended by Liskow & Lewis, the Louisiana Supreme Court recently denied Plaintiff-landowners’ writ application seeking review of an opinion of the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal that affirmed a unanimous jury verdict in favor of BP. Houssiere v. ASCO USA, 12-791 (La. 1/16/13), 108 So.
On September 2, 2016, the Texas Supreme Court agreed to review three oil and gas cases involving issues pertinent to the industry and land and mineral owners. is another top-lease case from the Amarillo Court of Appeals. BP America Production Company v. Red Deer Resources, LLC In BP America Production Company v. Laddex, Ltd.
Additionally, a motion to recuse was filed to remove Justice Crain from the case. Justice Crain had been previously removed from a case involving the Talbot, Carmouche, and Marcello law firm; however, in this case, the Louisiana Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s request, allowing Justice Crain to consider the writ application.
In two companion cases, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided whether a federal district court could properly exercise jurisdiction over climate change suits brought against energy companies by cities and counties in California. In City of Oakland et al. BP PLC et al. 1442(a)(1).
Dedicated Impex FZE is a provider of Drill Pipe Protectors and operates under the brand name DIC Oil Tools. This is particularly important because any damage to these areas can compromise the structural integrity of the pipe, leading to potential failures during operations. DIC products have earned ISO and API certifications.
In May 2018, oil and gas industry defendants removed a docket of 42 cases alleging violations of Louisiana’s coastal zone management laws to federal court in the Eastern and Western Districts of Louisiana (“CZM cases”). Defendants removed Auster (and 11 other Western District CZM cases) based on federal officer jurisdiction (28 U.S.C.
The challenge lies in understanding where these projects will connect, when theyll become operational, and how theyll impact transmission constraints. With rapid additions of new generation and load projects, traders face growing uncertainty and rising risks in the market. Why Choose Projected Capacity Impact?
Further, the responsible party for a vessel is any person owning or operating the vessel. OPA, however, also provides a responsible party with a complete defense to liability in the following circumstance: A responsible party is not liable.if
Stabbing guides are indispensable oilfield tools that help workers align two separate sections of drill pipe, tubing, or casing for a perfect male-to-female connection.
By Jana Grauberger The Texas Supreme Court distinguished several Texas appellate court decisions and held the exculpatory clause in a joint operating agreement (“JOA”) applicable not just to operational activities undertaken by the operator, but to all activities of the operator under the JOA. 10-0887, slip op.
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. 30:10 governed whether a unit operator may deduct post-production costs against UMO’s share of production proceeds. [3]
Part I of this blog covers some basics about state and federal courts, explaining why the jurisdictional question of where a case will be decided is often contested. Federal Court “Removal” is the name for the process when a party transfers a case originally filed in a state court to a federal court. Only the court is different.
The Appellate Division Fourth Department has rejected an attack on operations of a landfill based on rights granted by New York’s Green Amendment, holding that the state constitutional amendment does not create rights of action by private parties against private actors.
Previous Court Ruling In many cases alleging damage to property arising from historic oil and gas operations, the plaintiff was not the owner at the time of the alleged damage, but instead is the subsequent purchaser of the property at issue. In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. Amerada Hess Corp. , 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So.
2023), the Texas Supreme Court held that the lessee could not invoke a force majeure clause to save its oil and gas leases when it inadvertently scheduled its operations to begin after the requisite deadline. The Court narrowed its discussion to whether MRC’s operations were “delayed by” an event of force majeure.
In addition to being emission-free, in most cases EVs also have a lower cost of operation. In this case it’s road maintenance. The momentum behind EVs is undeniable. No more $50-100 fill-ups. But societal transitions often come with unintended consequences and EVs are no different.
Legacy Reserves Operating, LP, No. 12, 2012). Raven Resources (“Raven”) was interested in selling certain oil and gas related-properties to Legacy Reserves Operating LP, (“Legacy”). Raven employed Michael Lee as its primary contact in negotiations with Legacy over the sale of the property involved in the case.
Aethon Energy Operating, L.L.C. , 11, 2022), provides further guidance on what must be contained in correspondence from parties making demand on an operator under La. 30:9(B) in which Aethon Energy Operating, L.L.C. Aethon”) was the designated operator. Kelly Land Company, L.L.C. 4th 369 (5th Cir. Kelly Land Co.,
Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas LLC, a subsidiary of Denbury Resources, applied with the RRC for a permit to build and operate a CO 2 pipeline in Texas. Denbury Green noted in its permit application that the CO 2 pipeline would be operated as a “common carrier”, and indicated that the gas would be “owned by others, but transported for a fee.”
The case involved a proposed oil and gas waste injection well in the Barnett Shale Area. The Commission and the proposed injection well operator appealed to the Supreme Court of Texas. The supreme court framed the issue as a statutory construction inquiry.
Flint 1 applied to the case at hand, barring claimants from recovering economic damages for deferred oil production. This case required a complex analysis of Robins Dry Dock due to separate entities, under claimants’ parent company, owning the pipeline, and leasing the wells and platforms. On October 30, 2023, the U.S.
Additionally, a motion to recuse was filed to remove Justice Crain from the case. Justice Crain had been previously removed from a case involving the Talbot, Carmouche, and Marcello law firm; however, in this case, the Louisiana Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s request, allowing Justice Crain to consider the writ application.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content