Casing E&A Manufacturing 
The Energy Law
JUNE 2, 2020
In two companion cases, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided whether a federal district court could properly exercise jurisdiction over climate change suits brought against energy companies by cities and counties in California. . 1442(a)(1). In City of Oakland et al. BP PLC et al. 1442(a)(1).
The Energy Law
MARCH 20, 2019
Supreme Court resolved a circuit split regarding maritime law and the “bare metal” defense, namely whether manufacturers have a duty to warn when their bare metal product requires later incorporation of a dangerous part in order for the integrated product to function as intended. Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Energy Law
FEBRUARY 4, 2021
The distributor filed suit against the manufacturer in federal district court alleging antitrust violations and seeking damages and injunctive relief, and the manufacturer moved to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. This is now the second time this case has been before the Supreme Court on issues of arbitrability.
The Energy Law
FEBRUARY 4, 2021
The distributor filed suit against the manufacturer in federal district court alleging antitrust violations and seeking damages and injunctive relief, and the manufacturer moved to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. This is now the second time this case has been before the Supreme Court on issues of arbitrability.
The Energy Law
MARCH 15, 2023
Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, it is expressly provided that the terms of this paragraph shall be controlling over the provisions of Paragraph 3 of this lease to the contrary and this paragraph shall not be treated as surplusage despite the holding in the cases styled “Heritage Resources, Inc. NationsBank”, 939 S.W.2d
The Energy Law
APRIL 8, 2008
2008), the Supreme Court held that the grounds for vacatur and modification of arbitration awards provided by §§ 10 and 11 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) are exclusive. The case began as a lease dispute between a landlord, Hall Street Associates, LLC, and tenant, Mattel, Inc., Mattel, Inc., 2008 WL 762537 (U.S.
AWS: Energy (Oil & Gas)
FEBRUARY 17, 2025
The platform covers all business cases for CPOs and EMSPs (E-Mobility Service Providers), public, private, and home charging. This usually happens over a wide array of charging stations from different manufacturers, each with its own quirks. What are the main challenges for EV charging network operators?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content