article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Holds that References to “One-Eighth” in Old Oil and Gas Conveyances Presumptively Refer to the Entire Mineral Estate

The Energy Law

In the 1920s—the time the deed at issue was executed—lessors commonly reserved a one-eighth royalty interest when they executed oil and gas leases. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. Element Petroleum Props.,

Royalty 98
article thumbnail

Louisiana Legislature to Consider Amendments to Forced Pooling Regime Requiring Operators to Pay Lessors of Nonparticipating Working Interest Owners Directly

The Energy Law

The current proposed bill, however, would require operators to remit all royalty payments directly to the lessors on behalf of nonparticipating working interest owners prior to well payout, i.e., during the recoupment of costs, and the statutorily authorized risk charge. Perhaps time will tell.

Royalty 98
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Texas Court Subjects Override to Non-Consent Penalties

The Energy Law

James Boldrick is an assignee of an overriding royalty interest in property subleased to BTA. BTA, the assignor and creator of Boldrick’s interest, elected non-consent status regarding the well at issue, proposed and drilled by Chevron. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of BTA and Boldrick appealed.

article thumbnail

Fixed vs. Floating Royalty Considered by Texas Supreme Court

Texas Oil & Gas Attorney

The Plaintiff sold land to a third party and reserved a 1/8 royalty nonparticipating royalty interest (fixed royalty language). Continue reading The post Fixed vs. Floating Royalty Considered by Texas Supreme Court appeared first on Texas Oil and Gas Attorney Blog. ConocoPhillips Co.,

Royalty 52
article thumbnail

Texas Appeals Court Interprets Mineral Conveyances

The Energy Law

Morris Resources, Ltd., Hamilton v. Morris Res., 04-05-00904-CV, 2007 WL 460648 (Tex. San Antonio Feb. 14, 2007).

article thumbnail

Court Addresses Sufficiency of Demand Letter Under Mineral Code Articles 212.21-23

The Energy Law

In exchange, the defendant agreed to transfer an overriding royalty interest in the subject prospect to the plaintiff in the event defendant acquired an interest in the prospect. In CLK Company , the parties entered into a confidentiality agreement whereby the plaintiff agreed to provide services to the defendant.

Royalty 40
article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Holds that Add-Back Provision in Oil and Gas Lease Required Royalties to be Paid on Prices in Excess of the Producers’ Gross Proceeds

The Energy Law

Regardless, upstream producers who own working interests in leases containing add-back clauses would benefit from contacting an experienced attorney for further evaluation on this evolving area of the law and on whether Sheppard applies to its leases. Communications include firm news, insights, and events.

Royalty 98