The Energy Law

JUNE 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124. [1] Tauren Exploration, Inc. Tauren Exploration, Inc.

Royalty 40

Royalty E&P Exploration and Production Operator 40

The Energy Law

OCTOBER 11, 2021

Over seven years later, New 90 and another plaintiff-landowner sued various oil and gas companies for contamination to the property based on historical exploration and production activities dating back to the 1940s. Communications include firm news, insights, and events.

Exploration and Production 52

Exploration and Production E&A Instrumentation Oil 52

The Energy Law

JUNE 12, 2017

Tauren Exploration, Inc. , The Second Circuit’s decision also addressed issues involving production in paying quantities and failure to pay royalties under the Louisiana Mineral Code, and a detailed discussion of those issues is also located on T he Energy Law Blog. Tauren Exploration, Inc., In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C.

Royalty 40

Royalty Exploration and Production Royalty Interest Operator 40

The Energy Law

NOVEMBER 7, 2014

Recently, when there was talk about Houston-based ATP Oil and Gas’ (ATP) legal problems, it was inevitably about its bankruptcy and its effort to bring the overriding royalty interests it had conveyed back into the bankrupt estate as debt instruments. Plans for its use or lease for exploration, development, or production activities.

Offshore 40

Offshore Exploration and Production Oil Government 40