Blog Casing Pipeline 
The Energy Law
JANUARY 28, 2022
Fifth Circuit held that a landowner is not entitled to a pipeline company’s profits as a consequence of a portion of a pipeline being located partially outside of a servitude. On the case’s second trip to the Fifth Circuit, the court focused upon the theories of recovery articulated by the Plaintiffs. Read the opinion here.
The Energy Law
JANUARY 28, 2022
Fifth Circuit held that a landowner is not entitled to a pipeline company’s profits as a consequence of a portion of a pipeline being located partially outside of a servitude. On the case’s second trip to the Fifth Circuit, the court focused upon the theories of recovery articulated by the Plaintiffs. Read the opinion here.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Energy Law
NOVEMBER 27, 2023
Flint 1 applied to the case at hand, barring claimants from recovering economic damages for deferred oil production. Claimants sought damages for alleged pipeline damage caused by the SEACOR POWER as well as economic damages from deferred oil production. Supreme Court in Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. 303 (1927).
The Energy Law
JUNE 29, 2023
In a unanimous decision, a three-judge panel of the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed the authority of the Louisiana Tax Commission to correct property tax assessments of pipelines when a local assessor uses values that are too high or do not reflect fair market value. In Enerfin Field Services v. 22-740 (La.
The Energy Law
APRIL 12, 2012
By Carlos Moreno : The Supreme Court of Texas recently delivered a revised opinion discussing the power of eminent domain exercised by a common carrier CO2 pipeline. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC , No. Denbury Green then attempted to condemn a pipeline easement from land owned by Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. Texas Rice”).
The Energy Law
MARCH 29, 2021
QEP Energy Company , the Western District of Louisiana rejected, for the second time in this case, Plaintiffs’ claims seeking a disgorgement of QEP’s profits. This case was handled by Paul Adkins of Liskow’s Baton Rouge office. Accordingly, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of QEP as to all of Plaintiffs’ claims.
The Energy Law
AUGUST 18, 2016
On August 16th, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) issued an advisory bulletin to clarify the regulatory requirements that may vary depending on the operational status of a pipeline under 49 C.F.R. These pipelines may still contain hazardous materials. Parts 192 and 195 (2016).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content