The Energy Law

JUNE 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124. [1] 1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. 035 cents per mcf.

Royalty 40

Royalty E&P Exploration and Production Operator 40

Producer's Edge

NOVEMBER 1, 2024

This article summarizes the arguments made by the parties, and the Justices' questions and observations at the oral argument. This case presents two critical questions: Who owns subsurface caverns created by salt mining operations, and How should in-kind royalties be calculated for salt production? 3d 39 , 47 (Tex.

Royalty 52

Royalty Royalty Interest Casing Oil 52

The Energy Law

OCTOBER 4, 2018

El Paso E & P Co. , El Paso E & P Co. , for a one-fourth (1/4) mineral royalty and as much as ten thousand ($10,000) dollars per acre bonus royalty.” For example, in Alyce Gaines Johnson Special Trust v. Alyce Gaines Johnson Special Trust v. 2d 640, 641-43 (W.D.

Gas 52

Gas Exploration and Production E&P E&A 52

The Energy Law

MARCH 11, 2020

UNOCAL also reserved a 3% overriding royalty. 2003) (“the regulations govern the parties’ joint and several liabilities vis-à-vis the Government not amongst themselves”) and Total E&P USA, Inc. UNOCAL assigned operating rights in the leases to ATP, who later assigned 20% of those rights to Sojitz. Parker Drilling Co. ,

Royalty 52

Royalty E&P Offshore E&A 52

The Energy Law

MARCH 10, 2023

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. 45X(c)(6)(P). [3] 30D(e)(1). [4] Communications include firm news, insights, and events. 1] 26 U.S.C. § 45X(b)(1)(M). [2] 2] 26 U.S.C. §

E&P 105

E&P E&A Oil Gas 105