Remove 2023 Remove Casing Remove Instrumentation
article thumbnail

AI and the Energy Grid: 10 Use Cases for Utilities

True Energy

Written by Marc Published January 29, 2025 Written by Marc Published January 29, 2025 AI and the Energy Grid: 10 Use Cases for Utilities AI and the energy grid are becoming closely connected as grids grow more complex and electrification increases. The growing need for AI in the energy grid At the end of 2023, over 2.5

Casing 52
article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Holds that References to “One-Eighth” in Old Oil and Gas Conveyances Presumptively Refer to the Entire Mineral Estate

The Energy Law

21-0146, 2023 WL 2053175 (Tex. 17, 2023), in which it re-affirmed the axiomatic principle that a text retains the same meaning in the present day as when it was drafted. In support of that notion, the Court cited the 1957 Texas Supreme Court case Garrett v. The Texas Supreme Court recently released its opinion in Van Dyke v.

Royalty 98
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

One Man’s Waste is Another Man’s Treasure: Texas Appellate Court Holds that Produced Water Belongs to Mineral Owners

The Energy Law

In response, the Texas Legislature passed Texas Natural Resources Code § 122.002 on September 1, 2019, which grants title to produced water to whoever takes possession of it for the purpose of treating it for subsequent beneficial use, unless a conveyance instrument expressly provides otherwise. 08-22-00037-CV, 2023 WL 4846861 (Tex.

Oil 98
article thumbnail

The Continued Struggle to Rebut the Van Dyke Presumption

Producer's Edge

Navigator Group that courts interpreting “antiquated instruments” that use 1/8 within a double fraction must begin with the rebuttable presumption that 1/8 refers to the entire mineral estate, Texas courts have wrestled with its implications. This article discusses a couple more cases in 2024. Brunelle, No.

article thumbnail

Louisiana’s Sabine River Authority Not Entitled To Sovereign Immunity

The Energy Law

The Fifth Circuit agreed with the lower court that state statutes and case law characterize SRA-L as an arm of the state; but caveated that the factor was restricted and “given the inconsistent descriptions in the same statutes and the lack of a more-definite characterization in either statute or case law.” [7] Sabine River Auth.,

Casing 52