This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Another case interpreting a royalty reservation in an old conveyance has been decided by the 11th Court of Appeals in Eastland: Boren Descendants and Mabee Descendants v. The deed reserves “an undivided one-fourth (1/4th) of the usual one eighth (18th) royalty.” Fasken Oil and Ranch, Ltd. , two consolidated appeals, Nos.
With the prevalence of cases involving royalty disputes in Texas, the state’s Supreme Court has never hesitated to address these issues. But the Court’s sporadic holdings regarding royalty clauses, each so specific to the particular language of the lease, have left lessees on unsteady footing. In 2019, the Court heard Burlington Res.
While the Court is no stranger to interpreting (and often muddling) the familiar royalty clause interpretation questions surrounding the first issue, in a case of first impression, the Court also analyzed the breadth of a lease’s free-use clause. after deductions), resulting in lower royalty payments for the royalty owners.
While the Court is no stranger to interpreting (and often muddling) the familiar royalty clause interpretation questions surrounding the first issue, in a case of first impression, the Court also analyzed the breadth of a lease’s free-use clause. after deductions), resulting in lower royalty payments for the royalty owners.
Free-Use Clause and Further Interprets Conflicting Royalty Clause Provisions The Texas Supreme Court recently issued its anticipated decision in BlueStone Natural Resources II, LLC v. For almost a decade, the original lessee to the agreements never subtracted post-production costs from the royalty owners’ royalty payments.
billion from 2011 to 2019. However, the tax will only affect companies currently using a loophole to avoid paying royalties on the energy supplies they drill. Those already paying royalties would get a tax credit. oil and gas supplies.
In 2019, CT Land invoked the burial provision in the mineral lease and sued Unitex for breach of the lease and for declaratory relief when Unitex refused to comply. The lease provided for a royalty calculated based on the “market value at the well.” In this case, CT Land and Cattle and Cattle Co., Randle, 620 S.W.3d
Recently, the Nigerian government demanded more than $60 billion in back royalties under a production sharing agreement with the supermajors operating in the country. million BPD as of November 2019. The rate of royalty will rise in tune with oil prices. How did this happen? on frontier and inland basin projects.
For nearly three years, unit operators in Louisiana have waited to see whether the Western District of Louisiana would change course or double down on its March 2019 decision in Johnson v. Chesapeake.
However, if the current trend continues, the Haynesville could approach its prior peak production average in early 2019. for a one-fourth (1/4) mineral royalty and as much as ten thousand ($10,000) dollars per acre bonus royalty.”
UNOCAL also reserved a 3% overriding royalty. Last year, in another dispute over who should bear the cost of decommissioning offshore facilities, the Southern District of Texas held that a former sub-assignee of offshore operating rights was entitled to equitable subrogation from the record title owner and initial assignor. Union Oil Co.
Jinapor highlighted the mining lease for lithium exploitation, emphasizing its global standard with provisions for value addition, increased royalties, and local participation. He clarified that the Clerk of Parliament’s official residence, alleged to have been sold in 2019, was actually sold in 2015.
On March 21, 2019, the U.S. 30:10] simply means that, for all of this, he is given the equivalent of a “no cost” royalty clause on production proceeds. 1] See 2019 WL 1301985 (W.D. Chesapeake Louisiana, LP. [1] 2] The UMOs argued that La. A strict construction of [La. This is hardly unjust. [19] Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
Alaska 2019) where the court found that OCSLA did not give the President specific authority to revoke a prior President’s withdrawal of OCS lands from disposition. The Court discussed League of Conservation Voters v. Trump , 363 F. 3d 1013 (D. at 38-40. (2) 2) Substantial Threat of Irreparable Harm.
Alaska 2019) where the court found that OCSLA did not give the President specific authority to revoke a prior President’s withdrawal of OCS lands from disposition. The Court discussed League of Conservation Voters v. Trump , 363 F. 3d 1013 (D. at 38-40. (2) 2) Substantial Threat of Irreparable Harm.
Alaska 2019) where the court found that OCSLA did not give the President specific authority to revoke a prior President’s withdrawal of OCS lands from disposition. The Court discussed League of Conservation Voters v. Trump , 363 F. 3d 1013 (D. at 38-40. (2) 2) Substantial Threat of Irreparable Harm.
became “energy independent” and a net exporter of petroleum products in 2019. Due to the sharp increase in oil and gas production, the U.S. If President Trump is re-elected, his Administration is expected to continue, and may even accelerate, these efforts in support of his America First Energy Plan. s energy sector.
became “energy independent” and a net exporter of petroleum products in 2019. Due to the sharp increase in oil and gas production, the U.S. If President Trump is re-elected, his Administration is expected to continue, and may even accelerate, these efforts in support of his America First Energy Plan. s energy sector.
became “energy independent” and a net exporter of petroleum products in 2019. Due to the sharp increase in oil and gas production, the U.S. If President Trump is re-elected, his Administration is expected to continue, and may even accelerate, these efforts in support of his America First Energy Plan. s energy sector.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content