Remove 2017 Remove Casing Remove E&P
article thumbnail

Trans Energy Settlement Shows Need for E&P Wetlands Compliance Strategy

The Energy Law Blog

The Trans Energy settlement shows that exploration and production (E&P) companies need a rigorous compliance strategy for wetlands permit requirements. On the other hand, the legal commentary has virtually ignored the importance of Nationwide Permits (NWPs) 12 and 39 to E&P activities. See 77 Fed. 10184 (Feb.

E&P 40
article thumbnail

Haynesville shale gas production is increasing again; Will Haynesville-related litigation increase again, too?

The Energy Law Blog

The second major increase began in early 2017 and continues through today. El Paso E & P Co. , El Paso E & P Co. , El Paso E & P Co. , In that case, the plaintiff-lessors argued, the lease should be rescinded based on their error. Alyce Gaines Johnson Special Trust v.

Gas 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Louisiana Second Circuit Provides Clarity on Production in Paying Quantities and Affirms Lease Cancellation Under Mineral Code Article 140 for Failure to Pay Royalties

The Energy Law Blog

On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124. [1] EP Energy E&P Co., Tauren Exploration, Inc.

Royalty 40
article thumbnail

Who Owns the Void? Oral Arguments at SCOTX Regarding Underground Storage Rights

Producer's Edge

The Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments last week in a case that could substantially clarify, or even fundamentally reshape, the characterization and ownership of underground storage rights in Texas. The case was Myers-Woodward v. The case remains pending before the Texas Supreme Court on petition for review.

Royalty 52
article thumbnail

Fifth Circuit Rules “Approximate Physical Presence” is Required for General Personal Jurisdiction

The Energy Law Blog

P N K (Lake Charles) L.L.C., But in so doing, the court may have announced a new jurisdictional test with significant ramifications for future cases. So, the question on appeal was whether this was the “exceptional case” where personal jurisdiction could also be exercised in another state. 1549 (2017). Brown , 564 U.S.

E&P 40
article thumbnail

IS THE FREEWAY IN SIGHT?

Oil and Gas Investments

The OEM doesn’t design the whole car, and Arteris doesn’t design the whole chip, but they are a key piece of the final product (in this case the semiconductor). It is roughly the same price Intel paid to take Mobileye over in 2017. Thats a hefty P/E. After all, Tesla is a trillion-dollar company.

IT 52