This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On September 2, 2016, the Texas Supreme Court agreed to review three oil and gas cases involving issues pertinent to the industry and land and mineral owners. Red Deer has been set for oral argument on November 10, 2016. is another top-lease case from the Amarillo Court of Appeals. BP America Production Company v.
Together, these developments will undoubtedly lead to more litigation and a higher cost of doing business on the Outer Continental Shelf. The number of civil penalty cases has risen gradually since 2009, with a sharp increase over 2013-2015. The average civil penalty amount per case has also grown, especially in the last two years.
Case: Warren v. 2016-C-1647 (La. 4] This case is the first pronouncement from the Louisiana Supreme Court that punitive damages are available under general maritime law. 471 (2008) limited the ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages in maritime cases at 1:1. Shelter Mutual Ins. 10/18/17), So. Baker , 554 U.S.
2016), a decision that was “legally indistinguishable,” albeit only persuasive and non-binding. Hoffman , 209 So.3d The Court also looked to the recent United States Fifth Circuit opinion of Deperrodil v. Bozovic Marine, Inc. , 3d 353 (5th Cir. Simmons at 7.
In support of that notion, the Court cited the 1957 Texas Supreme Court case Garrett v. Another possible example, though not noted by the Court, can be seen in a case currently pending before the Eastland Court of Appeals: PetroLegacy Energy II, LLC v. Dils Co. , 2d 904 (Tex. Dawkins , 483 S.W.3d Element Petroleum Props.,
In March 2016, the Louisiana First Circuit recognized the preemptive authority of state law to regulate and permit fracking. Now, the Colorado Supreme Court rendered two opinions on May 2, 2016 finding state law preempted local efforts to prohibit fracking. Colorado Oil and Gas Association , 2016 CO 29, P. City of Longmont v.
On April 21, 2016 the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied several petitions for rehearing en banc a Sixth Circuit panel decision that looked at which courts (federal district court or federal courts of appeal) have original jurisdiction to hear challenges to the EPA’s Clean Water Rule.
EPA cannot require electricity generation to be shifted from coal-burning units to units that use natural gas or renewable energy sources without a clear statement from Congress. EPA also cannot require electricity generation to be shifted from coal-burning units to units that use other energy sources as a pollution control technology.
In January 2016, Judge Haik retired from the bench and the case was transferred to Judge Drell. 2:08CV00893, 2016 WL 1158075, at *4 (W.D. CITGO filed an appeal of the ruling with the Fifth Circuit on May 4, 2016. See Environmental Enforcement Results for 2015 , 2015 ABA Env’t Energy, & Resources L.:
in TDX Energy, LLC v. 5] Similar to XXI Oil & Gas I , TDX Energy involved a claim by a non-operating working interest owner that it was entitled to 103.1 13] On September 28, 2016, the Louisiana Third Circuit issued another opinion in XXI Oil & Gas v. 1] See TDX Energy, LLC v. 2016 WL 1179206 (W.D.
of natural gas in future cases. Hilcorp Energy Co., 2016-C-2181 (2017). [2] Hilcorp Energy Co., 9/28/2016), 2016 WL 5404650 [3] See id. [4] 4] See TDX Energy, LLC v. 4] See TDX Energy, LLC v. 2016 WL 1179206 (W.D. La 2016) (finding that only unleased mineral owners are entitled to 103.1
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied Defendants’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc in the case titled Markle Interests, L.L.C., Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.
In a breach of contract case involving the overlay of intellectual property and contract law, Luv n’ care, Ltd, a global leader in the design and sale of baby products, filed suit against its former distributor, Groupo Rimar, a.k.a. Suavinex, S.A. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit reversed in a unanimous opinion. Luv n’ care, Ltd.
On May 4, 2016, environmental groups sued the U.S. McCarthy , Case No. In that case, the parties eventually settled, and EPA agreed in a consent decree to finalize RCRA Subtitle D coal ash regulations by a certain date. The lawsuit is styled as Environmental Integrity Project, et al. 1:16-cv-00842-JDB, and was filed in the U.S.
Maintaining that the plaintiff qualified as a seaman under controlling Fifth Circuit precedent but questioning that precedent in light of Supreme Court case law, the panel urged the Fifth Circuit to review the case en banc. Smart Fabricators of Texas (“SmartFab”) fabricates steel and repairs oil and gas drilling equipment. 1349(b)(1).
On June 17, 2016, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that an oil and gas producer (“Southwest”) was not entitled to a statutory exemption from sales taxes on its purchases of casing, tubing and pumps used in the production of oil and gas (the “Equipment”). At issue in Southwest Royalties, Inc.
Since this blog’s post on production in paying quantities on January 26, 2016 , the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal rendered its latest decision on the subject in Middleton v. EP Energy E&P Co., 50,300-CA (La. Firstly, the decision reaffirms that extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses are not operating expenses.
Maintaining that the plaintiff qualified as a seaman under controlling Fifth Circuit precedent but questioning that precedent in light of Supreme Court case law, the panel urged the Fifth Circuit to review the case en banc. Smart Fabricators of Texas (“SmartFab”) fabricates steel and repairs oil and gas drilling equipment. 1349(b)(1).
Sentencing is scheduled in Mobile, Alabama, for February 11, 2016. One important take-away from this case is that the investigation, commitment of resources and prosecution of MARPOL criminal cases remains a high priority with the United States Coast Guard and the United States Department of Justice.
XTO Energy, Inc. , D&D”) filed suit in the Seventh Judicial District Court of Concordia Parish against XTO Energy, Inc. (“XTO”), would not extend venue to Alliance, Pritchard, or James River, even if they were joint or solidary obligors of XTO, “because the article that governs venue in the case of joint and solidary obligors, La.
On February 1, 2016, a federal district court issued a ruling in Moore v. 2016) , with important implications for “legacy” lawsuits in Louisiana. 3) should be limited to those cases in which a landowner has an express contract-based claim for additional remediation. Denbury , — F.3d
OilPro distributes LiftPlus Energy Solutions in conventional and SAGD applications. Other: Gas Lift (GL); Plunger Lift (PL) LiftPlus Energy Solutions developed the “4th” option, a hybrid system that combines some of the best of each of the above system principles. LiftPlus is a unique, proven artificial lift system.
Plaintiffs alleged that despite advance knowledge of the likelihood for significant downstream flooding, SRA-L decided to open spillway gates freeing water from the reservoir into the Sabine River to alleviate elevated reservoir volumes from a cataclysmic rain storm in March of 2016.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”) recently issued a proposed rule on Risk Management, Financial Assurance and Loss Prevention (“Proposed Rule”), which was published in the Federal Register on October 16, 2020 and is now open for public comment.
With the prevalence of cases involving royalty disputes in Texas, the state’s Supreme Court has never hesitated to address these issues. Heritage Resources is the underlying case that must be understood to decipher the Supreme Court’s logic as it continues to rectify the numerous creative royalty provisions across Texas today.
Parts 192 and 195 (2016). In both cases, the prior owner or operator allegedly had not followed the proper procedure for abandoning a pipeline, specifically regarding purging the pipeline of hazardous material. This clarification comes after a number of leaks in 2014 and 2015 from pipelines that were believed to be “abandoned.”
15-290, 2016 WL 3041052 (U.S. May 31, 2016). In this case, a company, Hawkes, was interested in purchasing land in northern Minnesota to mine peat. Thus, JDs in both cases have practical legal consequences. Army Corps of Engineers v. JDs are binding for five years.
The case eventually proceeded to trial wherein the jury was instructed to determine whether there was a substantial nexus between Mays’s death and Chevron’s OCS operations. The Court also distinguished Valladolid and another case cited by Chevron, Baker v. The jury found there was. Gulf Island Marine Fabricators, L.L.C. ,
For more information on how the subsequent purchaser doctrine has been applied in legacy cases, click here.) Yesterday, (June 13, 2016), the First Circuit denied the writ “on the showing made.” Thus, the “subsequent purchaser doctrine” has become a key defense for mineral lessee defendants in legacy litigation. Sterling Sugars Inc.,
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”) recently issued a proposed rule on Risk Management, Financial Assurance and Loss Prevention (“Proposed Rule”), which was published in the Federal Register on October 16, 2020 and is now open for public comment.
Following that, they will receive a mining concession from the Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy. The preliminary environmental license was awarded in 2016, but then left in limbo for the following 6 years while objections went through the courts to decide if all aspects of the license had been done in compliance.
CFTC Time-Limited No-Action Relief The CFTC’s final margin rules for non-cleared swaps were published in January 2016, and require swap dealers to collect and post variation margin with each counterparty that is a swap dealer, major swap participant or financial end user. [3] 6, 2016). [4] 4] CFTC Letter No. 17-11 is available here. [5]
The USFWS’ critical habitat designation was upheld by Judge Feldman in the Eastern District of Louisiana in 2014, affirmed by a 2-1 decision in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2016, and denied an en banc rehearing by an 8-6 vote of the Fifth Circuit in February 2017.
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right. [1] Unsurprisingly, the case has generated significant media interest. 1] Juliana v. 23] Yahoo!
On February 25, 2016, the EPA proposed revisions to its Risk Management Program (RMP) rule. This is especially true given that EPA recently added “Reducing Risks of Accidental Releases at Industrial and Chemical Facilities” as a new National Enforcement Initiative starting on October 1, 2016. Click here to see the proposed rule.
The case stems from Executive Orders issued under the Obama Administration in 2015 and 2016 which withdrew certain areas in the Arctic and Atlantic regions from exploration and development under the offshore oil and gas leasing program. Trump , 3:17-00101.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content