This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
For example, in 2014 the agency imposed a civil penalty of $1,230,000—an unprecedented figure in the history of the BSEE civil penalty program. BSEE collected civil penalties in 22 cases in 2009, 26 cases in 2010, 30 cases in 2011, 31 cases in 2012, 42 cases in 2013, 53 cases in 2014, and 42 cases in 2015.
Last week the Texas Supreme Court granted review in Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. a case concerning Texas partnership law. Energy Transfer Partners has garnered significant amicus support on both sides of the “v.” and has been closely followed by the energy industry. Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. ,
The Louisiana Supreme Court recently issued a decision in a downhole damages case, reversing the Third Circuit’s misguided application of the manifest error standard of review. 2014-C-2592, 2015 La. The case itself necessitated extremely nuanced and technical testimony regarding the geology and geophysics of the formations.
On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. Trans Energy, Inc. , The Trans Energy settlement shows that exploration and production (E&P) companies need a rigorous compliance strategy for wetlands permit requirements. 14-117 (N.D.W.Va.),
The distributor argued that the inclusion of its request for injunctive relief brought the case under the carve-out in the arbitration provision. This is now the second time this case has been before the Supreme Court on issues of arbitrability. It also rejected the “wholly groundless” exception altogether. 3d 1010 (2d Cir.
In Point Energy Partners Permian, LLC v. The lessee, MRC Permian Company, received four identical oil and gas leases from certain lessors in 2014. The lessee, MRC Permian Company, received four identical oil and gas leases from certain lessors in 2014. MRC Permian Company , — S.W.3d 21-0461, 2023 WL 3028100 (Tex.
Produced water can also contain certain critical minerals that can be used for the development of clean energy technologies. [1] COG owned the minerals under four leases in Reeves County, Texas executed between 2005 and 2014. 1] Thus, conflicts arose between surface owners and mineral owners over the ownership of produced water.
3] In 2014, the Bottley heirs (represented by the same counsel as Lester ) filed a motion to consolidate the Bottley action with Lester. However, the Court emphasized Congress’s intent for CAFA to apply to “ any civil action commenced” after CAFA’s effective date—in this case, Bottley is that civil action. Exxon Mobil Corp.,
Maintaining that the plaintiff qualified as a seaman under controlling Fifth Circuit precedent but questioning that precedent in light of Supreme Court case law, the panel urged the Fifth Circuit to review the case en banc. Both plaintiffs were seaman under the nature test, and the panel could not distinguish Sanchez’s case.
The district court dismissed their case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court dismissed their case under Rule 12(b)(6). 2] Here, this was not the case. 2014); Barker v. 2014); Barker v. On January 11, 2021, the Fifth Circuit panel affirmed. 20, 2010 , 452 F. 3d 455, 463 (E.D.
Maintaining that the plaintiff qualified as a seaman under controlling Fifth Circuit precedent but questioning that precedent in light of Supreme Court case law, the panel urged the Fifth Circuit to review the case en banc. Both plaintiffs were seaman under the nature test, and the panel could not distinguish Sanchez’s case.
Today the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in this landmark case concerning punitive damages. 2014) held that punitive damages were not available under the rationale of an earlier Supreme Court case, Miles v. Estis Well Service , 768 F.3d 3d 382 (5 th Cir. Apex Marine, 498 U.S.
Under the bill, the GHG permitting process will be exempt from TCEQ’s contested case hearing requirements in an effort to make the process more efficient. The rules will likely be adopted in early 2014 and will become effective immediately. However, the case is still pending before the D.C. 10-1425, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 15210 (D.C.
In January 2016, Judge Haik retired from the bench and the case was transferred to Judge Drell. The result is consistent, however, with the EPA’s 2014-2018 Strategic Plan of focusing on large cases, and its recent pattern of pursuing fewer enforcement actions with larger resolutions. CITGO Petroleum Corp., Year in Rev.
2014) (en banc). In reaching its decision, the Ninth Circuit was required to distinguish the recent en banc Fifth Circuit McBride decision, which reached the opposite conclusion in 2014. Our experienced attorneys are available to assist in all aspects of maritime and energy advice, contracts negotiation, and litigation.
The distributor argued that the inclusion of its request for injunctive relief brought the case under the carve-out in the arbitration provision. This is now the second time this case has been before the Supreme Court on issues of arbitrability. It also rejected the “wholly groundless” exception altogether. 3d 1010 (2d Cir.
The court interpreted the 2014 amendments to Act 312 (La. Specifically, Subsection (M), enacted in 2014, allows damages awards only for (a) The cost of funding the feasible plan adopted by the court. (b) 3) should be limited to those cases in which a landowner has an express contract-based claim for additional remediation.
On May 30, 2014, in an unanimous decision in National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. The EPA had argued that an operationally interdependent relationship (in the Summit case, spanning a 43-square mile area) was enough to find that pollutant-emitting activities were “adjacent.” May 30, 2014).
The district court dismissed their case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court dismissed their case under Rule 12(b)(6). 2] Here, this was not the case. 2014); Barker v. 2014); Barker v. On January 11, 2021, the Fifth Circuit panel affirmed. 20, 2010 , 452 F. 3d 455, 463 (E.D.
30:10 was inapplicable to the case because the costs outlined in the statute comprised only pre-production and production costs. 21] Although the Johnson case provides one federal district court’s interpretation on an issue of first impression, it raises more unanswered questions for unit operators in Louisiana. 12] See id. [13]
With the prevalence of cases involving royalty disputes in Texas, the state’s Supreme Court has never hesitated to address these issues. Heritage Resources is the underlying case that must be understood to decipher the Supreme Court’s logic as it continues to rectify the numerous creative royalty provisions across Texas today.
In 2014, St. These recent cases point out that the authority to regulate fracking varies from state to state and should be evaluated accordingly. This moratorium, like the home-rule charter article, was preempted by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Act. The Colorado opinions echo the recent ruling of the Louisiana First Circuit.
In a case sure to be used as a sword by many defendants in the prevalent NORM (naturally occurring radioactive material) litigation in Louisiana and elsewhere, Patricia Lennie, et al. In doing so, the Fifth Circuit distinguished a prior case, Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al., Exxon Mobil Corp., 10-743 (La. 5/31/12), 102 So.3d
But in so doing, the court may have announced a new jurisdictional test with significant ramifications for future cases. So, the question on appeal was whether this was the “exceptional case” where personal jurisdiction could also be exercised in another state. 117 (2014). [4] P N K (Lake Charles) L.L.C., Brown , 564 U.S.
On March 25, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) jointly released a proposed rule purporting to clarify the scope of the “waters of the United States” protected under the Clean Water Act. The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v.
This clarification comes after a number of leaks in 2014 and 2015 from pipelines that were believed to be “abandoned.” In both cases, the prior owner or operator allegedly had not followed the proper procedure for abandoning a pipeline, specifically regarding purging the pipeline of hazardous material.
Oil and gas operator, Delaware Basin Resources LLC (DBR), entered into 13 leases with 13 mineral owners in February 2014, all of which were essentially the same. Thus, the entire case hinges on the power of the conjunction “and” to conjoin two noncontiguous sections into a single tract. described as follows: Section 6. and Section 2.”
Settoon arose out of a February 2014 collision on the Mississippi River near Convent, Louisiana. These types of damages, however, have long been prohibited under the general maritime law (the default body of federal common law governing maritime cases) under the familiar Robins Dry Dock rule.
On September 14, 2014, James Mays, a valve technician and an employee of Furmanite American (“Furmanite”) died while servicing valves on a platform that was part of Chevron’s gas gathering system and located in Louisiana’s territorial waters. The Court also distinguished Valladolid and another case cited by Chevron, Baker v.
On June 20, 2014, the Supreme Court of Texas ruled in Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. Disconcertingly, the court of appeals held that the case was “decided under the accommodation doctrine,” which neither Key nor the Hegars contended applied.
Supreme Court case, Burwell v. 2751 (2014). Duncan has also recently acted as general counsel for Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and was lead counsel on behalf of Hobby Lobby in the recent U.S. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., Mr. Duncan received his undergraduate and law degrees from Louisiana State University and earned an L.L.M.
Oil and gas operator, Delaware Basin Resources LLC (DBR), entered into 13 leases with 13 mineral owners in February 2014, all of which were essentially the same. Thus, the entire case hinges on the power of the conjunction “and” to conjoin two noncontiguous sections into a single tract. described as follows: Section 6. and Section 2.”
On November 5, 2014, the landowner provided notice to the mineral servitude owner that the mineral servitude expired and requested a recordable act evidencing its expiration effective June 28, 2006. A well was spud on March 28, 2006. The well was a dry hole, however, and was therefore plugged and abandoned on April 21, 2006.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”) recently issued a proposed rule on Risk Management, Financial Assurance and Loss Prevention (“Proposed Rule”), which was published in the Federal Register on October 16, 2020 and is now open for public comment.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”) recently issued a proposed rule on Risk Management, Financial Assurance and Loss Prevention (“Proposed Rule”), which was published in the Federal Register on October 16, 2020 and is now open for public comment.
Thus, they filed an original Writ of Mandamus with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on September 11, 2014, seeking to force the DOT to respond their petition for an immediate ban. Citing In re American Rivers , 372 F.3d 3d 413, 419 (D.C. Circuit 2004).
The USFWS’ critical habitat designation was upheld by Judge Feldman in the Eastern District of Louisiana in 2014, affirmed by a 2-1 decision in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2016, and denied an en banc rehearing by an 8-6 vote of the Fifth Circuit in February 2017.
According to EPA, the 2014 Request for Information on RMP revisions received 579 public comments plus 99,713 letters and signatures from various mass mail campaigns. EPA-HQ-OEM-2014-0328-0001. The RMP proposal is expected to garner a lot of attention from both industry and Non-Governmental Organizations. See Docket ID.
Source: Zeo Energy Corp Investor Presentation The market got worse every quarter of 2023. Enphase Energy (ENPH NASDAQ) estimated 90% of their installs included batteries in Q2. At the time SunPower acquired them, Blue Raven had a CAGR of 93% since 2014. The new rules (called net electricity metering – NEM 3.0)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content