Producer's Edge

NOVEMBER 1, 2024

This case presents two critical questions: Who owns subsurface caverns created by salt mining operations, and How should in-kind royalties be calculated for salt production? ” The Fifth Circuit, applying Texas law in  Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Interest, Inc. —San Antonio 2013, no pet.) 3d 39 , 47 (Tex.

Royalty 52

Royalty Royalty Interest Casing Oil 52

The Energy Law

APRIL 19, 2021

Eastland 2013, pet. denied) (“ Eagle I ”), TRO-X alleged that Eagle deprived TRO-X of its right to acquire certain mineral interests upon the sale of several leases in violation of their agreement. When the suit went to trial, the leases subject to the Chesapeake sale had not generated any royalty income. TRO-X, L.P. ,

Royalty 52

Royalty Exploration and Production IT Casing 52

The Energy Law

APRIL 19, 2021

Eastland 2013, pet. denied) (“ Eagle I ”), TRO-X alleged that Eagle deprived TRO-X of its right to acquire certain mineral interests upon the sale of several leases in violation of their agreement. When the suit went to trial, the leases subject to the Chesapeake sale had not generated any royalty income. TRO-X, L.P. ,

Exploration and Production 40

Exploration and Production Royalty IT Oil 40

The Energy Law

NOVEMBER 7, 2014

Recently, when there was talk about Houston-based ATP Oil and Gas’ (ATP) legal problems, it was inevitably about its bankruptcy and its effort to bring the overriding royalty interests it had conveyed back into the bankrupt estate as debt instruments. See United States v. ATP Oil & Gas Corp. , 955 F.Supp.2d 2d 616 (E.D.

Offshore 40

Offshore Exploration and Production Oil Government 40