The Energy Law

MARCH 15, 2023

2023), in which it held that lessees owed royalties in excess of their gross proceeds, specifically “adding back” costs incurred by third-party buyers that were enumerated in the sales contract and subtracted from the sales price. The lessees owned working interests in certain oil and gas leases that were executed in 2007.

Royalty 98

Royalty Oil Gas Downstream 98

The Energy Law

MAY 24, 2007

11-06-00029-CV, 2007 WL 865811 (Tex. Eastland March 22, 2007). James Boldrick is an assignee of an overriding royalty interest in property subleased to BTA. BTA, the assignor and creator of Boldrick’s interest, elected non-consent status regarding the well at issue, proposed and drilled by Chevron.

Royalty Interest 40

Royalty Interest Royalty Division Order IT 40

The Energy Law

MAY 25, 2007

04-05-00904-CV, 2007 WL 460648 (Tex. 14, 2007). Morris Resources, Ltd., Hamilton v. Morris Res., San Antonio Feb.

Royalty Interest 40

Royalty Interest Royalty Oil Gas 40

The Energy Law

JANUARY 25, 2008

07-834, 2007 WL 4409686 (La. 12/19/07), the court addressed the payment of royalties and penalties under Mineral Code article 212.23(c) In exchange, the defendant agreed to transfer an overriding royalty interest in the subject prospect to the plaintiff in the event defendant acquired an interest in the prospect.

Royalty 40

Royalty Royalty Interest Casing IT 40