Texas Appeals Court Interprets Mineral Conveyances
The Energy Law
MAY 25, 2007
04-05-00904-CV, 2007 WL 460648 (Tex. 14, 2007). Morris Resources, Ltd., Hamilton v. Morris Res., San Antonio Feb.
2007 Energy Royalty Interest 
40 
Texas Court Subjects Override to Non-Consent Penalties
The Energy Law
MAY 24, 2007
11-06-00029-CV, 2007 WL 865811 (Tex. Eastland March 22, 2007). James Boldrick is an assignee of an overriding royalty interest in property subleased to BTA. BTA, the assignor and creator of Boldrick’s interest, elected non-consent status regarding the well at issue, proposed and drilled by Chevron.
Join 5,000+
Insiders
Sign Up for our Newsletter
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Court Addresses Sufficiency of Demand Letter Under Mineral Code Articles 212.21-23
The Energy Law
JANUARY 25, 2008
CXY Energy, Inc. , 07-834, 2007 WL 4409686 (La. 12/19/07), the court addressed the payment of royalties and penalties under Mineral Code article 212.23(c) When defendant refused to assign the overriding royalty interest to the plaintiff, plaintiff brought action, inter alia , for penalties under Article 212.23(c).
Texas Supreme Court Holds that Add-Back Provision in Oil and Gas Lease Required Royalties to be Paid on Prices in Excess of the Producers’ Gross Proceeds
The Energy Law
MARCH 15, 2023
The Texas Supreme Court recently released its opinion in Devon Energy Production Company, L.P. 2023), in which it held that lessees owed royalties in excess of their gross proceeds, specifically “adding back” costs incurred by third-party buyers that were enumerated in the sales contract and subtracted from the sales price.
Let's personalize your content