Remove 2007 Remove E&P Remove IT
article thumbnail

2023 Master Plan Brings Updates to Coastal Research and Projects

The Energy Law

The most recent draft is the fourth update since it was first adopted by the Louisiana Legislature in 2007 following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005. [1] The most recent draft is the fourth update since it was first adopted by the Louisiana Legislature in 2007 following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005. [1]

E&P 98
article thumbnail

Air Permitting: Sixth Circuit Vacates Single Stationary Source Aggregation Determination for E&P Facilities Due to EPA’s Unreasonable Interpretation of Adjacent

The Energy Law

In 2007, in guidance specifically addressing oil and gas activities, EPA stated that “proximity is the most informative factor in making source determinations.” Under different administrations, EPA has changed its guidance on the meaning of this phrase. See Memorandum from William L. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 09-4348, slip op.

E&P 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Upholds Railroad Commission’s Regulation of Commingled Oil and/or Gas Drilling and Production

The Energy Law

By Leta Seletzky : In Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. 03-0364, 2007 WL 1299163 (Tex. Railroad Comm’n, No. The petitioner also asserted that the Commission’s denial of the permit amounted to an unconstitutional taking of gas in the sand from which the well would produce.

Oil 40
article thumbnail

Louisiana Second Circuit Provides Clarity on Production in Paying Quantities and Affirms Lease Cancellation Under Mineral Code Article 140 for Failure to Pay Royalties

The Energy Law

4] In 2007, Fossil Operating, Inc. between May 2007 and February 2010. [20] (“Tauren”) and contained a three year primary term as well as a horizontal and vertical Pugh clause. [3] 3] Tauren subsequently assigned a 49% interest in the lease to Cubic Energy, Inc. 5] Chesapeake Operating, Inc. The defendant’s appealed.

Royalty 40