Texas Supreme Court Holds Producer Not Required to Share in Natural Gas Pipeline Compression Costs
The Energy Law
JUNE 30, 2015
In 2005, Kachina (the Buyer) and Lillis (the Seller) entered into a new Gas Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”). Kachina argued that the Compression Station, though pre-existing, “effects delivery” by “lowering suction” which reduced upstream pressure and aided the flow of gas into the pipeline.
40 
Let's personalize your content