MMS Proposes Royalty Relief Amendments
The Energy Law Blog
JUNE 4, 2007
Hunter MMS has announced proposed amendments to its deep gas royalty relief regulations under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
The Energy Law Blog
JUNE 4, 2007
Hunter MMS has announced proposed amendments to its deep gas royalty relief regulations under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
The Energy Law Blog
JANUARY 4, 2007
13-99-757, 2005 WL 167051 (Tex.App.—Corpus 27, 2005, pet. The royalty owners intervened and asserted claims against Exxon for, among others, common law waste, statutory waste, negligence per se, tortious interference, and failure to develop. Exxon’s Petition for Review was filed September 9, 2005, arguing that: 1.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Energy Law Blog
DECEMBER 11, 2006
. — (2006), the Supreme Court resolved a legal issue that has been at the center of federal royalty litigation for twenty years: viz. founded upon any contract,” applies to administrative royalty payment orders issued by the Minerals Management Service (MMS). whether 28 U.S.C. On appeal, the D.C. Amoco Production Co. Watson , 410 F.3d
The Energy Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 21, 2016
On appeal, the Amarillo Court of Appeals agreed with Red Deer, finding that BP could not invoke the lease’s shut-in royalty clause because production from the last well was so slow that production in paying quantities had ceased, and thus the lease terminated, prior to BP shutting the wells in and offering to pay shut-in royalties.
The Energy Law Blog
AUGUST 27, 2007
This rule is operative without any formal order.
Let's personalize your content