Remove 2005 Remove Downstream Remove Upstream
article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Holds Producer Not Required to Share in Natural Gas Pipeline Compression Costs

The Energy Law

In 2005, Kachina (the Buyer) and Lillis (the Seller) entered into a new Gas Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”). Kachina argued that the Compression Station, though pre-existing, “effects delivery” by “lowering suction” which reduced upstream pressure and aided the flow of gas into the pipeline.