Texas Supreme Court Holds Producer Not Required to Share in Natural Gas Pipeline Compression Costs
The Energy Law
JUNE 30, 2015
In 2005, Kachina (the Buyer) and Lillis (the Seller) entered into a new Gas Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”). If Lillis’ wells failed to do so, then the Agreement provided Kachina with two options: “[i]t may do nothing, in which case the well will be released from the Agreement.
40 
Let's personalize your content