The Energy Law

MARCH 30, 2017

Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. 20] The CUA permit was obtained on January 20, 2004. 20] The CUA permit was obtained on January 20, 2004.

Spud-in 40

Spud-in Operator IT E&A 40

The Energy Law

MAY 26, 2023

38:232(B)(2) clearly delineates SRA-L’s authority to sue and be sued in its own name. As for the sixth and final factor, though SRA-L pointed to La. 3] “Denials of motions to dismiss on sovereign immunity grounds fall within the collateral order doctrine, and are thus immediately appealable.” Caremark, Inc., 3d 655, 658 (5th Cir. 4 (5th Cir.

Casing 52

Casing IT E&A Education 52

The Energy Law

JUNE 12, 2017

arose from a 2004 mineral lease covering nearly 1,400 acres in Sections 9, 10, 15, 16, and 21, Township 15 North, Range 15 West, in Caddo Parish. [2] Gloria’s Ranch ultimately filed suit against Tauren, Cubic, EXCO, and Wells Fargo for their failure to provide a recordable instrument evidencing the expiration of the lease. 31:124, cmt.;

Royalty 40

Royalty E&P Exploration and Production Operator 40