2004, E&P and Operator - Energy Aggregated

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2004

E&P

Operator

Louisiana Second Circuit Provides Clarity on Production in Paying Quantities and Affirms Lease Cancellation Under Mineral Code Article 140 for Failure to Pay Royalties

The Energy Law

JUNE 12, 2017

arose from a 2004 mineral lease covering nearly 1,400 acres in Sections 9, 10, 15, 16, and 21, Township 15 North, Range 15 West, in Caddo Parish. [2] 4] In 2007, Fossil Operating, Inc. 5] Chesapeake Operating, Inc. 19] Another expert testified that the well in Section 21 was operated at a cumulative net loss of $115,248.74

Royalty

Royalty E&P Exploration and Production Operator

Fifth Circuit to Hold Oral Argument in Sojitz v. UNOCAL in April 2020

The Energy Law

MARCH 11, 2020

Last year, in another dispute over who should bear the cost of decommissioning offshore facilities, the Southern District of Texas held that a former sub-assignee of offshore operating rights was entitled to equitable subrogation from the record title owner and initial assignor. Sojitz Energy Venture, Inc. Union Oil Co. of California , 394 F.

Royalty

Royalty E&P Offshore E&A

Louisiana Second Circuit Provides Clarity on Production in Paying Quantities and Affirms Lease Cancellation Under Mineral Code Article 140 for Failure to Pay Royalties

Fifth Circuit to Hold Oral Argument in Sojitz v. UNOCAL in April 2020

Stay Connected