The Energy Law

APRIL 21, 2021

The Gulf of Mexico Region requires operators to conduct monthly inspections via vessel, helicopter, or other means. BSEE currently requires pipeline inspections to ensure the integrity of active pipelines. The specific inspection requirements are set by region. billion and identified a lack of funding for removal.

Abandonment 52

Abandonment Pipeline Offshore E&A 52

The Energy Law

MARCH 11, 2020

Last year, in another dispute over who should bear the cost of decommissioning offshore facilities, the Southern District of Texas held that a former sub-assignee of offshore operating rights was entitled to equitable subrogation from the record title owner and initial assignor. Sojitz Energy Venture, Inc. Union Oil Co. of California , 394 F.

Royalty 52

Royalty E&P Offshore E&A 52

The Energy Law

MARCH 30, 2017

In Petro-Chem Operating Co., 1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. Flat River Farms, L.L.C. , Flat River Farms, L.L.C. , 12] In its analysis, the Court first looked to the pertinent language of La.

Spud-in 40

Spud-in Operator IT E&A 40

The Energy Law

APRIL 21, 2021

The Gulf of Mexico Region requires operators to conduct monthly inspections via vessel, helicopter, or other means. BSEE currently requires pipeline inspections to ensure the integrity of active pipelines. The specific inspection requirements are set by region. billion and identified a lack of funding for removal.

Abandonment 40

Abandonment Pipeline Offshore E&A 40

The Energy Law

JUNE 12, 2017

arose from a 2004 mineral lease covering nearly 1,400 acres in Sections 9, 10, 15, 16, and 21, Township 15 North, Range 15 West, in Caddo Parish. [2] 4] In 2007, Fossil Operating, Inc. 5] Chesapeake Operating, Inc. 1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. Tauren Exploration, Inc.

Royalty 40

Royalty E&P Exploration and Production Operator 40

The Energy Law

MAY 26, 2023

7] The Fifth Circuit noted that even though the SRA-L was made part of the umbrella of the executive branch via its placement in the Department of Transportation and Development after its creation, it maintained substantial control over its operations. Tarrant County , 798 F.2d 2d 736, 744-45 (5 th Cir.

Casing 52

Casing IT E&A Education 52