Must FERC weigh GHG emissions in pipeline reviews?
Global Energy
MAY 21, 2018
In the 2004 case of U.S. Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen,[1] the Supreme Court established an important limiting principle under […]
Global Energy
MAY 21, 2018
In the 2004 case of U.S. Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen,[1] the Supreme Court established an important limiting principle under […]
The Energy Law
APRIL 29, 2016
Louisiana appellate court unanimously dismisses cross-appeals in legacy case, finding that the trial court improperly designated partial summary judgment rulings as final under Article 1915 of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure. In Spanish Lake Restoration, LLC v. Shell Oil Company, et al. , Rosenblum , 2004-1664 (La.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Energy Law
APRIL 5, 2018
ATHOS I had its genesis in a 2004 vessel allision and oil spill on the Delaware River between New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The ATHOS I was contracted to deliver crude oil from Venezuela to a syndicate of CITGO interests, collectively referred to as “CARCO.” 2701, et seq. Frescati spent $143 million cleaning up the river.
The Energy Law
DECEMBER 16, 2015
The Louisiana Supreme Court recently issued a decision in a downhole damages case, reversing the Third Circuit’s misguided application of the manifest error standard of review. The first, the “Rice Acres well”, produced until 2004 when production ceased due allegedly to water migration into the production zones. Kerr-McGee Rocky Mt.,
The Energy Law
JANUARY 9, 2018
The case called upon the court to determine whether a contract for performance of specialty services to facilitate the drilling or production of oil and gas on navigable waters is maritime in nature. Gulf Oil Corp. , 16-30217 (5th Cir. 8, 2018). 2d 313 (5th Cir. Kirby , 543 U.S.
The Energy Law
MARCH 30, 2017
1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. 14] The Second Circuit’s decision in regard to this issue does not represent a departure from the viewpoint that most in the oil and gas industry have towards notarial acts of correction.
The Energy Law
JUNE 12, 2017
1] In the case, a landowner sued its mineral lessees for: (1) failure to provide a recordable act evidencing the expiration of a mineral lease under Mineral Code articles 206-209 and (2) failure to pay royalties under Mineral Code articles 137-140. [2] 3] The Lease was executed in September 2004 and covered 1,390.25 4] $242,029.26
Let's personalize your content