article thumbnail

Must FERC weigh GHG emissions in pipeline reviews?

Global Energy

In the 2004 case of U.S. Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen,[1] the Supreme Court established an important limiting principle under […]

article thumbnail

Louisiana Appellate Court Unanimously Dismisses Cross-Appeals in Legacy Case

The Energy Law Blog

Louisiana appellate court unanimously dismisses cross-appeals in legacy case, finding that the trial court improperly designated partial summary judgment rulings as final under Article 1915 of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure. In Spanish Lake Restoration, LLC v. Rosenblum , 2004-1664 (La. Shell Oil Company, et al. ,

Casing 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Third Circuit Issues Long-Awaited Ruling in OPA Liability Case

The Energy Law Blog

ATHOS I had its genesis in a 2004 vessel allision and oil spill on the Delaware River between New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Procedural History The case was originally tried in a forty-one day bench trial by Judge John P. This raises a dire warning to defendants in cases involving subrogated claims.

Casing 40
article thumbnail

Appellate Review of Downhole Cases: The Supreme Court Repairs the Third Circuit’s Broken Manifest Error Standard in Hayes Fund for the First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. Kerr-McGee Rocky Mt., LLC, 149 So. 3d 280 (La. App. 3 Cir. 10/01/14)

The Energy Law Blog

The Louisiana Supreme Court recently issued a decision in a downhole damages case, reversing the Third Circuit’s misguided application of the manifest error standard of review. The first, the “Rice Acres well”, produced until 2004 when production ceased due allegedly to water migration into the production zones. Kerr-McGee Rocky Mt.,

Casing 40
article thumbnail

Highly Anticipated En Banc Fifth Circuit Opinion Reframes Maritime Contract Analysis

The Energy Law Blog

The case called upon the court to determine whether a contract for performance of specialty services to facilitate the drilling or production of oil and gas on navigable waters is maritime in nature. In a highly anticipated ruling, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its en banc decision in In re: Larry Doiron, Inc. ,

Oil 40
article thumbnail

Choice-of-Law Provisions in Marine Insurance Contracts Upheld by the Supreme Court

The Energy Law Blog

The case was remanded and the District Court was instructed to consider if the application of New York contract law would violate Pennsylvania’s public policy, meaning Pennsylvania law should apply. 14, 27 (2004). In his concurrence, Justice Thomas did not show the same reverence to the Wilburn Boat holding. 2 1 348 U.S. 310 (1955).

article thumbnail

Louisiana Second Circuit Addresses: (1) Creation of Mineral Servitudes Via Notarial Acts of Correction; (2) Obstacles Suspending the Prescription of Nonuse from Running Against Mineral Servitudes; and (3) Payment of Court Costs in Concursus Actions

The Energy Law Blog

1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. 20] The CUA permit was obtained on January 20, 2004. 20] The CUA permit was obtained on January 20, 2004. Flat River Farms, L.L.C. , 13] The Court then applied La.

Spud-in 40