The Energy Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 4, 2012
Tyler 2003, pet. 2003, no pet.), The Texas Supreme Court stated that those cases all involved interpreting the exculpatory clause language of either the 1977 or 1982 A.A.P.L. In recent years, appellate decisions in Castle Tex. Long Trusts , 134 S.W.3d 3d 267 (Tex. denied), IP Petroleum Co., Wevanco Energy, L.L.C. , 3d 888 (Tex.
The Energy Law Blog
OCTOBER 25, 2017
Case: Warren v. 4] This case is the first pronouncement from the Louisiana Supreme Court that punitive damages are available under general maritime law. 471 (2008) limited the ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages in maritime cases at 1:1. Shelter Mutual Ins. 2016-C-1647 (La. 10/18/17), So. Baker , 554 U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Energy Law Blog
JUNE 29, 2010
The Supreme Court of Texas agreed, and remanded the case to the court of appeals for remittitur consistent with its opinion. Campbell , 538 U.S. times actual damages was constitutionally excessive where only one of the five reprehensibility factors favored exemplary damages.
The Energy Law Blog
JANUARY 26, 2016
4] Paying quantities cases usually focus on what expenses constitute “operating expenses.” “Operating expenses”—or “lifting expenses” as they are sometimes referred—are “ordinary, recurring expenses” that are attributable to the expense of production, after the well is drilled and completed. [5] McKinney , 545 So. 2d 1216, 1220 (La.
The Energy Law Blog
JANUARY 28, 2021
In 2003, the Louisiana Supreme Court rendered its landmark decision in Corbello, et al. Recently, those typical types of claims have been supplemented in some legacy litigation cases with citizen suit allegations based on the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act. Iowa Production, et al.
The Energy Law Blog
JUNE 30, 2015
In 2003, Kachina installed the “Barker Central Compression Station” (“Compression Station”) on its pipeline, which allowed it to resell the gas in the pipeline at its high-pressure inlet, increasing its re-sale value to Davis. Michael Lillis (“Lillis”) was one of the producers who sold natural gas to Kachina, dating back to 2001.
The Energy Law Blog
MARCH 31, 2021
While the Court is no stranger to interpreting (and often muddling) the familiar royalty clause interpretation questions surrounding the first issue, in a case of first impression, the Court also analyzed the breadth of a lease’s free-use clause.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
40 
Let's personalize your content